In broad terms, uncontrolled glare increases the risk of errors, fatigue and consequently accidents, whether it be in the workplace or in the home, etc.
We’ve all experienced the blinding effect associated with disability glare, whether it’s the poorly focused headlights of an oncoming car on a country road at night or exiting the cinema into midday sunlight.
Discomfort glare, as the term suggests, is not as drastic as disability glare, but it can take its toll if we are spending extended periods under lighting with poor glare control, which is much more common than it should be.
Discomfort glare is broken down into either direct or reflected categories.
Luminance at 65° of <3000 cd/m2
Other relevant documentation includes SLL and CIBSE Code for Lighting.
UGR<16 – Technical Drawing Office
UGR<19 – Offices, Schools
UGR<22 – Workshops, Receptions, Retail
At this point in time, LEDs are the brightest light sources utilised in general lighting with the most light emitted per unit area.
With the ongoing miniaturisation trend in the LED market, LED package sizes have reduced, while relative light output has increased; resulting in further gains in brightness and thereby leading to a greater propensity for glare.
1. EN 12464-1:2011 – Lighting of workplaces. Part 1: Indoor workplaces
2. CIE 117:1995 – Discomfort glare in interior lighting
3. IES LM-79-08: Electrical and photometric measurements of solid-state lighting products
4. EN 13032-1:2004+A1:2012 – Measurement and presentation of photometric data of lamps and luminaires. Measurement file format.
5. EN 13032-2:2017 – Measurement and presentation of photometric data of lamps and luminaires. Presentation of data for indoor and outdoor workplaces.
6. EN 13032-3:2007 – Measurement and presentation of photometric data of lamps and luminaires. Presentation of data for emergency lighting of workplaces.
7. EN 13032-4:2015 – Measurement and presentation of photometric data of lamps and luminaires. LED lamps, modules and luminaires.
8. CIBSE SLL Code for Lighting 2012
9. CIBSE LG3
Glare is not solely determined by the light source and the overall room configuration must be considered.
Due to the number of variables involved, with many of them unique to the specific installation site, glare cannot be distilled down to a single value for a light fitting.
Therefore, glare is determined by carrying out photometric testing on a light fitting with reference to CIE 117:1995 and presented in a standardised UGR table.
Achieving UGR<19 for all entries on the UGR table is an unrealistic expectation, as it would restrict other light source parameters and create other challenges. However, it is a reasonable expectation that all entries in the first columns of the UGR table viewed crosswise and viewed endwise would meet UGR<19 – see ROBUS SPACE UGR Table below.
It should be noted that the UGR method does not take account of diagonal geometries, only x and y directions.
The photometric measurement also facilitates the luminance (or amount of light emitted per unit area in a specific direction) of the source to be determined to ensure compliance with luminance requirements of EN 12464-1 (<3000 cd/m2 at 65°).
The luminance requirement in EN 12464-1 is a legacy CAT 2 Louvre requirement from LG3:1989, which was updated with the advent of anti-glare screen technology.
One obvious method of achieving UGR<19 for an LED panel, for example, is to restrict the beam angle, however, this could lead to a reduction in the overall illuminance uniformity on the floor, especially for lower ceiling heights.
Meeting glare requirements is a delicate balancing act – this is where good lighting designers come into their own by using the relevant light fitting photometric files with specialist light modelling software to produce designs where the competing requirements of UGR and uniformity tensors are met as per the specification.
LED Group is particularly discerning in delivering its ROBUS UGR<19 LED panel ranges, although there is evidence that not all major lighting companies are choosing this responsible approach.
For example, it is completely misleading to market and promote an LED panel as UGR<19, where it can be proven by analysing the photometric files in a lighting design that the panel achieves UGR<19 only for a maximum room size of 3.2m x 6.4m (assuming ceiling height of 2.4m and desk height of 0.8m and that panel could be installed in either crosswise or endwise orientation).
As a case in point, included below are UGR tables produced under the same conditions using RELUX design software for the latest ROBUS SPACE UGR<19 panels from LED Group and the latest panel from another major lighting company (Company X), marketed as UGR<19 in Ireland and UK.
UGR<19 entries in the first columns are highlighted to illustrate the disparity in glare performance.
Although not a legal requirement, compliance with EN 12464-1 is recommended as best practice.
There is a real need for clarity and openness on glare requirements in the lighting market and at the very least, customers deserve to know and understand if a light fitting rated as UGR<19 does not perform as described.
In the meantime, the onus is on specifiers to look beyond claims and carry out due diligence by engaging fully with lighting companies and lighting designers to select products that meet the glare requirements of the project.